How America Changed During Donald Trump'southward Presidency

Donald Trump stunned the political world in 2016 when he became the showtime person without regime or military feel ever to be elected president of the Us. His iv-yr tenure in the White House revealed extraordinary fissures in American society only left lilliputian doubtfulness that he is a figure unlike whatsoever other in the nation's history.

Trump, the New York businessman and erstwhile reality Television set show star, won the 2016 election after a entrada that defied norms and commanded public attention from the moment it began. His approach to governing was equally unconventional.

Other presidents tried to unify the nation later on turning from the campaign trail to the White House. From his start days in Washington to his final, Trump seemed to revel in the political fight. He used his presidential megaphone to criticize a long list of perceived adversaries, from the news media to members of his ain administration, elected officials in both political parties and foreign heads of land. The more than than 26,000 tweets he sent as president provided an unvarnished, real-time business relationship of his thinking on a broad spectrum of issues and somewhen proved so provocative that Twitter permanently banned him from its platform. In his concluding days in office, Trump became the offset president ever to be impeached twice – the 2d fourth dimension for inciting an insurrection at the U.Due south. Capitol during the certification of the election he lost – and the nation'southward offset primary executive in more than 150 years to refuse to attend his successor's inauguration.

Trump'south policy record included major changes at home and away. He achieved a string of long-sought conservative victories domestically, including the biggest corporate tax cuts on tape, the elimination of scores of environmental regulations and a reshaping of the federal judiciary. In the international arena, he imposed tough new clearing restrictions, withdrew from several multilateral agreements, forged closer ties with State of israel and launched a tit-for-tat trade dispute with Mainland china as function of a wider effort to address what he saw every bit glaring imbalances in America's economical relationship with other countries.

Many questions near Trump's legacy and his function in the nation's political futurity will take fourth dimension to answer. But some takeaways from his presidency are already articulate from Pew Research Center'due south studies in recent years. In this essay, nosotros accept a closer expect at a few of the key societal shifts that accelerated – or emerged for the get-go time – during the tenure of the 45th president.

Related: How America Changed During Barack Obama's Presidency

This exam of how the Us changed during Donald Trump'south presidency is based on an analysis of public opinion survey data from Pew Research Center, authoritative data from government agencies, news reports and other sources. Links to the original sources of information – including the field dates, sample sizes and methodologies of individual surveys by the Center – are included wherever possible. Unless otherwise noted, all references to Republicans and Democrats in this analysis include independents who lean to each party.

Deeply partisan and personal divides

Trump's condition every bit a political outsider, his outspoken nature and his willingness to upend past community and expectations of presidential behavior fabricated him a constant focus of public attending, also every bit a source of deep partisan divisions.

Fifty-fifty before he took part, Trump divided Republicans and Democrats more than than any incoming master executive in the prior three decades.1 The gap merely grew more than pronounced after he became president. An average of 86% of Republicans approved of Trump'due south treatment of the job over the course of his tenure, compared with an average of just 6% of Democrats – the widest partisan gap in approval for whatsoever president in the modern era of polling.2 Trump's overall blessing rating never exceeded fifty% and vicious to a low of merely 29% in his final weeks in office, before long after a mob of his supporters attacked the Capitol.

Trump left office with the lowest approval rating of his presidency.

Republicans and Democrats weren't simply divided over Trump'due south handling of the job. They also interpreted many aspects of his character and personality in fundamentally reverse means. In a 2019 survey, at least 3-quarters of Republicans said the president's words sometimes or oftentimes made them feel hopeful, entertained, informed, happy and proud. Even larger shares of Democrats said his words sometimes or frequently fabricated them feel concerned, exhausted, angry, insulted and confused.

The strong reactions that Trump provoked appeared in highly personal contexts, too. In a 2019 survey, 71% of Democrats who were single and looking for a human relationship said they would definitely or probably not consider existence in a committed relationship with someone who had voted for Trump in 2016. That far exceeded the 47% of single-and-looking Republicans who said they would not consider existence in a serious relationship with a Hillary Clinton voter.

Republicans, Democrats differed widely in their reactions to Trump's words

Many Americans opted not to talk virtually Trump or politics at all. In 2019, almost half of U.S. adults (44%) said they wouldn't feel comfy talking about Trump with someone they didn't know well. A like share (45%) said later that twelvemonth that they had stopped talking politics with someone because of something that person had said.

In addition to the intense divisions that emerged over Trump personally, his tenure saw a further widening of the gulf betwixt Republicans and Democrats over cadre political values and problems, including in areas that weren't especially partisan before his arrival.

In 1994, when Pew Enquiry Center began request Americans a series of x "values questions" on subjects including the role of authorities, environmental protection and national security, the average gap between Republicans and Democrats was fifteen percentage points. By 2017, the first year of Trump's presidency, the average partisan gap on those same questions had more than doubled to 36 points, the result of a steady, decades-long increase in polarization.

On some issues, at that place were bigger changes in thinking among Democrats than among Republicans during Trump'southward presidency. That was specially the case on topics such every bit race and gender, which gained new attending amid the Black Lives Matter and #MeToo movements. In a 2020 survey that followed months of racial justice protests in the U.S., for example, seventy% of Democrats said it is "a lot more difficult" to be a Blackness person than to be a White person in the U.S. today, up from 53% who said the same affair but four years earlier. Republican attitudes on the same question inverse little during that span, with only a minor share like-minded with the Democratic view.

On other bug, attitudes changed more than among Republicans than among Democrats. One notable case related to views of higher didactics: Between 2015 and 2017, the share of Republicans who said colleges and universities were having a negative upshot on the style things were going in the U.S. rose from 37% to 58%, even as effectually seven-in-ten Democrats connected to say these institutions were having a positive issue.

Related: From #MAGA to #MeToo: A Look at U.S. Public Opinion in 2017

A dearth of shared facts and data

One of the few things that Republicans and Democratscouldagree on during Trump'due south tenure is that they didn't share the same set of facts. In a 2019 survey, around three-quarters of Americans (73%) said most Republican and Democratic voters disagreed not only over political plans and policies, but over "bones facts."

Most Americans said in 2019 that Republican and Democratic voters can't agree on 'basic facts.'

Much of the disconnect between the parties involved the news media, which Trump routinely disparaged as "fake news" and the "enemy of the people." Republicans, in item, expressed widespread and growing distrust of the press. In a 2019 survey, Republicans voiced more distrust than trust in 2o of the 30 specific news outlets they were asked about, even as Democrats expressed more trust than distrust in 22 of those same outlets. Republicans overwhelmingly turned to and trusted one outlet included in the study – Play a joke on News – even equally Democrats used and expressed trust in a wider range of sources. The study concluded that the two sides placed their trust in "2 nearly inverse media environments."

Some of the media organizations Trump criticized most vocally saw the biggest increases in GOP distrust over fourth dimension. The share of Republicans who said they distrusted CNN rose from 33% in a 2014 survey to 58% by 2019. The proportion of Republicans who said they distrusted The Washington Post and The New York Times rose 17 and 12 percentage points, respectively, during that bridge.3

In improver to their criticisms of specific news outlets, Republicans also questioned the broader motives of the media. In surveys fielded over the course of 2018 and 2019, Republicans were far less likely than Democrats to say that journalists human action in the best interests of the public, have high ethical standards, prevent political leaders from doing things they shouldn't and deal adequately with all sides. Trump's staunchest GOP supporters often had the most negative views: Republicans who strongly approved of Trump, for example, were much more likely than those who only somewhat approved or disapproved of him to say journalists have very low upstanding standards.

Facebook launched a "war room" at its headquarters ahead of the November 2018 midterm elections to combat the growing spread of misinformation on its platform. (Noah Berger/AFP via Getty Images)

Apart from the growing partisan polarization over the news media, Trump'south fourth dimension in function also saw the emergence of misinformation as a concerning new reality for many Americans.

One-half of U.S. adults said in 2019 that made-upward news and information was a very big problem in the country, exceeding the shares who said the same matter about racism, illegal immigration, terrorism and sexism. Around two-thirds said made-upwardly news and information had a big bear upon on public conviction in the regime (68%), while one-half or more said information technology had a major result on Americans' confidence in each other (54%) and political leaders' power to become piece of work done (51%).

Half of Americans said in 2019 that made-up news and information is a critical problem in the U.S.

Misinformation played an of import role in both the coronavirus pandemic and the 2020 presidential ballot. Virtually two-thirds of U.S. adults (64%) said in Apr 2020 that they had seen at least some made-up news and data nearly the pandemic, with effectually half (49%) proverb this kind of misinformation had caused a cracking deal of confusion over the basic facts of the outbreak. In a survey in mid-November 2020, half-dozen-in-ten adults said made-upwardly news and information had played a major role in the just-concluded ballot.

Conspiracy theories were an particularly salient class of misinformation during Trump'south tenure, in many cases amplified past the president himself. For example, well-nigh one-half of Americans (47%) said in September 2020 that they had heard or read a lot or a piddling about the drove of conspiracy theories known every bit QAnon, upwards from 23% earlier in the yr.iv Almost of those aware of QAnon said Trump seemed to support the theory's promoters.

Trump oft made disproven or questionable claims every bit president. News and fact-checking organizations documented thousands of his false statements over four years, on subjects ranging from the coronavirus to the economy. Peradventure none were more consequential than his repeated assertion of widespread fraud in the 2020 election he lost to Democrat Joe Biden. Even after courts effectually the state had rejected the claim and all fifty states had certified their results, Trump continued to say he had won a "landslide" victory. The false claim gained widespread currency among his voters: In a January 2021 survey, three-quarters of Trump supporters incorrectly said he was definitely or probably the rightful winner of the election.

New concerns over American democracy

Throughout his tenure, Donald Trump questioned the legitimacy of democratic institutions, from the costless press to the federal judiciary and the electoral process itself. In surveys conducted betwixt 2016 and 2019, more than half of Americans said Trump had little or no respect for the nation'south democratic institutions and traditions, though these views, besides, split sharply forth partisan lines.

The 2020 election brought concerns nearly democracy into much starker relief. Even before the election, Trump had bandage doubt on the security of mail-in voting and refused to commit to a peaceful transfer of power in the event that he lost. When he did lose, he refused to publicly concede defeat, his entrada and allies filed dozens of unsuccessful lawsuits to challenge the results and Trump personally pressured country regime officials to retroactively tilt the outcome in his favor.

The weeks of legal and political challenges culminated on Jan. 6, 2021, when Trump addressed a crowd of supporters at a rally outside the White Firm and again falsely claimed the election had been "stolen." With Congress coming together the aforementioned day to certify Biden's win, Trump supporters stormed the Capitol in an assail that left five people expressionless and forced lawmakers to be evacuated until gild could be restored and the certification could be completed. The House of Representatives impeached Trump a calendar week afterward a charge of inciting the violence, with 10 Republicans joining 222 Democrats in support of the decision.

Police clash with a mob of Trump supporters who breached security and stormed the U.S. Capitol building on Jan. vi, 2021. (Mostafa Bassim/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)

Almost Americans placed at to the lowest degree some blame on Trump for the riot at the Capitol, including 52% who said he diameter a lot of responsibility for it. Again, however, partisans' views differed widely: 81% of Democrats said Trump bore a lot of responsibility, compared with just 18% of Republicans.

Ahead of 2020 election, a record share of registered voters said it 'really mattered' who won.

Even as he repeatedly cast doubtfulness on the autonomous process, Trump proved to exist an enormously galvanizing figure at the polls. Virtually 160 1000000 Americans voted in 2020, the highest estimated turnout rate amongst eligible voters in 120 years, despite widespread changes in voting procedures brought on past the pandemic. Biden received more than 81 million votes and Trump received more than 74 million, the highest and second-highest totals in U.S. history. Turnout in the 2018 midterm election, the first after Trump took function, likewise set a modern-day tape.

Pew Research Centre surveys catalogued the high stakes that voters perceived, particularly in the run-up to the 2020 election. But before the election, around nine-in-10 Trump and Biden supporters said in that location would be "lasting impairment" to the nation if the other candidate won, and around viii-in-ten in each group said they disagreed with the other side not just on political priorities, simply on "cadre American values and goals."

Earlier in the year, 83% of registered voters said information technology "really mattered" who won the election, the highest pct for any presidential election in at to the lowest degree two decades. Trump himself was a clear motivating factor for voters on both sides: 71% of Trump supporters said earlier the ballot that their choice was more of a votefor the president than against Biden, while 63% of Biden supporters said their option was more of a voteagainst Trump than for his opponent.

A reckoning over racial inequality

Racial tensions were a constant undercurrent during Trump's presidency, often intensified by the public statements he made in response to loftier-profile incidents.

The death of George Floyd, in particular, brought race to the surface in a way that few other contempo events take. The videotaped killing of the unarmed, 46-year-old Black man by a White law officer in Minneapolis was among several police killings that sparked national and international protests in 2020 and led to an outpouring of public support for the Black Lives Matter movement, including from corporations, universities and other institutions. In a survey presently after Floyd's expiry in May, ii-thirds of U.S. adults – including majorities across all major racial and ethnic groups – voiced support for the motility, and use of the #BlackLivesMatter hashtag surged to a record high on Twitter.

Attitudes began to change as the protests wore on and sometimes turned violent, drawing sharp condemnation from Trump. By September, support for the Black Lives Matter move had slipped to 55% – largely due to decreases among White adults – and many Americans questioned whether the nation's renewed focus on race would lead to changes to address racial inequality or improve the lives of Black people.

Race-related tensions erupted into public view earlier in Trump's tenure, as well. In 2017, White nationalists rallied in Charlottesville, Virginia, to protest the removal of a Confederate statue amid a broader push to eliminate such memorials from public spaces across the country. The rally led to tearing clashes in the metropolis's streets and the expiry of a 32-year-old woman when a White nationalist deliberately collection a automobile into a crowd of people. Tensions also arose in the National Football game League every bit some players protested racial injustices in the U.S. past kneeling during the national anthem. The display prompted a backlash amidst some who saw it as disrespectful to the American flag.

In all of these controversies and others, Trump weighed in from the White House, but typically not in a way that virtually Americans saw every bit helpful. In a summer 2020 survey, for example, half-dozen-in-10 U.South. adults said Trump had delivered the wrong bulletin in response to the protests over Floyd's killing. That included around four-in-ten adults (39%) who said Trump had delivered thecompletely wrong message.

More broadly, Americans viewed Trump's impact on race relations as far more than negative than positive. In an early 2019 poll, 56% of adults said Trump had fabricated race relations worse since taking office, compared with only 15% who said he had made progress toward improving relations. In the same survey, around two-thirds of adults (65%) said it had go more mutual for people in the U.S. to express racist or racially insensitive views since his election.

A majority of Americans said in 2019 that Trump had worsened race relations in the U.S.

The public also perceived Trump as as well shut with White nationalist groups. In 2019, a majority of adults (56%) said he had done too little to altitude himself from these groups, while 29% said he had done nearly the right amount and seven% said he had done too much. These opinions were nearly the same as in December 2016, before he took office.

While Americans overall gave Trump much more negative than positive marks for his handling of race relations, in that location were consistent divisions along racial, ethnic and partisan lines. Black, Hispanic and Asian adults were often more critical of Trump's affect on race relations than White adults, every bit were Democrats when compared with Republicans. For instance, while an overwhelming majority of Democrats (83%) said in 2019 that Trump had washed also niggling to distance himself from White nationalist groups, a majority of Republicans (56%) said he had done nigh the right amount.

White Republicans, in particular, rejected the idea of widespread structural racism in the U.S. and saw too much emphasis on race. In September 2020, around viii-in-10 White Republicans (79%) said the bigger problem was people seeing racial bigotry where it doesn't be, rather than people non seeing discrimination where it really does exist. The opinions of White Democrats on the same question were nigh the reverse.

A defining public health and economic crisis

Every presidency is shaped by exterior events, and Trump'south will undoubtedly exist remembered for the enormous toll the coronavirus pandemic took on the nation'southward public health and economy.

More than 400,000 Americans died from COVID-xix between the offset of the pandemic and when Trump left office, with fatality counts sometimes exceeding iv,000 people a mean solar day – a price more severe than theoverall toll of the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, or the bombing of Pearl Harbor on December. 7, 1941. Trump himself contracted the coronavirus in the home stretch of his entrada for reelection, as did dozens of White House and campaign staff and members of his family.

The far-reaching public health effects of the virus were reflected in a survey in November 2020, when more half of U.S. adults (54%) said they personally knew someone who had been hospitalized or died due to COVID-19. The shares were fifty-fifty higher among Black (71%) and Hispanic (61%) adults.

Nurses and health care workers mourn and remember colleagues who had died of COVID-nineteen outside Mount Sinai Hospital in Manhattan in April 2020. (Johannes Eisele/AFP via Getty Images)

At the aforementioned fourth dimension, the pandemic had a disastrous effect on the economic system. Trump and Barack Obama together had presided over the longest economic expansion in American history, with the U.S. unemployment rate at a 50-year low of 3.5% as recently as Feb 2020. By Apr 2020, with businesses around the country closing their doors to prevent the spread of the virus, unemployment had soared to a mail-World War II high of 14.8%. Even afterwards considerable employment gains later in the year, Trump was the first modern president to leave the White House with fewer jobs in the U.S. than when he took office.

U.S. unemployment rate more than quadrupled between February and April 2020 as coronavirus struck.

The economic consequences of the virus, like its public wellness repercussions, hit some Americans harder than others. Many upper-income workers were able to go on doing their jobs remotely during the outbreak, even every bit lower-income workers suffered widespread chore losses and pay cuts. The remarkable resiliency of U.S. stock markets was a rare brilliant spot during the downturn, only one that had its own implications for economic inequality: Going into the outbreak, upper-income adults were far more likely than lower-income adults to be invested in the market.

The pandemic conspicuously underscored and exacerbated America'due south partisan divisions. Democrats were consistently much more likely than Republicans to run into the virus as a major threat to public health, while Republicans were far more likely than Democrats to see it equally exaggerated and overblown. The two sides disagreed on public health strategies ranging from mask wearing to contact tracing.

The outbreak also had important consequences for America's image in the world. International views of the U.S. had already plummeted after Trump took office in 2017, but attitudes turned fifty-fifty more negative amongst a widespread perception that the U.S. had mishandled the initial outbreak. The share of people with a favorable opinion of the U.Southward. fell in 2020 to record or about-record lows in Canada, France, Germany, Japan, the U.k. and other countries. Across all 13 nations surveyed, a median of just xv% of adults said the U.S. had done a skilful job responding to COVID-nineteen, well beneath the median share who said the same matter well-nigh their own land, the World Health Organization, the European Union and Prc.

Across 13 countries surveyed in 2020, most people rated U.S. response to thee coronavirus outbreak poorly.

At a much more personal level, many Americans expected the coronavirus outbreak to have a lasting impact on them. In an August 2020 survey, 51% of U.S. adults said they expected their lives to remain changed in major means even after the pandemic is over.

Looking ahead

The aftershocks of Donald Trump's i-of-a-kind presidency will take years to identify into total historical context. It remains to be seen, for example, whether his disruptive make of politics will be adopted by other candidates for role in the U.S., whether other politicians tin activate the same coalition of voters he energized and whether his positions on free trade, immigration and other issues will be reflected in government policy in the years to come.

Some of the about pressing questions, particularly in the aftermath of the attack on the Capitol and Trump's subsequent bipartisan impeachment, concern the future of the Republican Party. Some Republicans take moved away from Trump, merely many others accept continued to fight on his behalf, including past voting to reject the electoral votes of two states won by Biden.

The GOP'south management could depend to a considerable degree on what Trump does next. Around ii-thirds of Americans (68%) said in January 2021 that they wouldnot similar to see Trump continue to be a major political figure in the years to come, but Republicans were divided by ideology. More than than half of self-described moderate and liberal Republicans (56%) said they preferred for him to get out the political stage, while 68% of conservatives said they wanted him to remain a national political figure for many years to come.

Joe Biden, newly sworn in as the 46th president, signs documents at the U.S. Capitol formalizing his Cabinet and sub-Cabinet nominations on Jan. twenty, 2021. (Jim Lo Scalzo/Pool/AFP via Getty Images)

For his office, Joe Biden has some advantages as he begins his tenure. Democrats take majorities – admitting extraordinarily narrow ones – in both legislative chambers of Congress. Other recent periods of single-party command in Washington have resulted in the enactment of major legislation, such as the $1.5 trillion tax cutting package that Trump signed in 2017 or the wellness care overhaul that Obama signed in 2010. Biden begins his presidency with generally positive assessments from the American public about his Cabinet appointments and the job he has washed explaining his policies and plans for the future. Early on surveys show that he inspires broad confidence amidst people in 3 European countries that take long been important American allies: France, Federal republic of germany and the UK.

Still, the new assistants faces obvious challenges on many fronts. The coronavirus pandemic will continue in the months alee every bit the vast majority of Americans remain unvaccinated. The economy is probable to struggle until the outbreak is nether control. Polarization in the U.S. is not likely to change dramatically, nor is the partisan gulf in views of the news media or the spread of misinformation in the historic period of social media. The global challenges of climate change and nuclear proliferation remain stark.

The nation'southward 46th president has vowed to unite the country as he moves forward with his policy agenda. Few would question the formidable nature of the task.

Title photo: President Donald Trump and showtime lady Melania Trump board Air Force One for his last time every bit president on Jan. xx, 2021. (Pete Marovich–Puddle/Getty Images)